By BDTI, 12/10/2004
Xilinx recently announced the architectural details of its new FPGA family,
the Virtex-4. As explained in the July
2004 edition of “Inside DSP,” the Virtex-4 family includes three
“platforms” that feature different ratios of reconfigurable logic,
multipliers, and other features. These platforms give Virtex-4 users freedom
to choose a feature mix that is best for their applications. For example, all
three platforms include a device with roughly 60,000 logic cells. The LX “logic”
device contains 64 hard-wired 18-bit multipliers and 360 Kbytes of hard-wired
memory. In contrast, the SX “signal-processing” device contains
512 multipliers and 720 Kbytes of memory. The FX “full-featured”
device—which includes two hardwired PowerPC cores—falls between
the LX and SX devices in terms of multipliers and memory.
The features of the Virtex-4 FX are similar to those of the older Virtex-II
Pro FPGAs. However, the Virtex-4 FX operates at faster clock frequencies, and
the new family includes parts with higher capacities than any Virtex-II Pro.
Although Xilinx has not yet released pricing for the Virtex-4 FX, BDTI anticipates
that Virtex-4 FX devices will also be significantly less expensive than Virtex-II
Pro parts with similar capacities.
Interestingly, the Virtex-4 LX resembles the competing Altera Stratix II family
in most respects. However, Virtex-4 LX parts have fewer multipliers than Stratix
II parts with similar amounts of programmable logic. For example, the Stratix
II family includes a device that offers the equivalent of 60,000 logic cells,
310 Kbytes of memory, and 144 multipliers. As described above, a similar Virtex
LX device offers only 64 multipliers.
Although Xilinx has not announced pricing for the Virtex FX, it has released
pricing for a few LX and SX parts. These prices suggest that the Virtex-4 LX
will cost somewhat less than Stratix II parts with similar capacities. In contrast,
it appears that Virtex-4 SX parts will offer greater capabilities and higher
prices than Stratix II parts with similar amounts of programmable logic. In
2005, BDTI plans to perform in-depth analysis to more accurately determine how
these competitors stack up in the context of signal-processing applications.
For more information, contact Jeremy Giddings (giddings@BDTI.com).
|